The Climiglaw Database
A global climate mobility case law database
This is a beta version of the Climiglaw Database, a free-to-access global database collating and summarising judicial decisions concerning all forms of internal and cross border climate-related (im)mobility. It is co-created by the Global Strategic Litigation Council, Earth Refuge, the Raoul Wallenberg Institute and the Zolberg Institute for Migration & Mobility.
The database is designed to support civil society in their efforts across the world to effectively advocate for the rights of all climate-displaced people. If you have any feedback or would like to propose new cases to add to the database, please click here.
RS and Others (Zimbabwe – AIDS) Zimbabwe CG [2010] UKUT 363 (IAC)
13 Oct 2010
Decision in judgment: In favor of the State
Country of origin
Zimbabwe
Host origin
United Kingdom
Type of mobility
Cross-border
Hazard
Epidemic/Pandemic/Other, Other
Rights invoked
Prohibition of Torture, Inhumane and Degrading Treatment, Right to Private/Family Life, Other
Vulnerability characteristics
Ill health
Applicant description
Other
Description
Three HIV positive women supporters of the opposition in Zimbabwe unsuccessfully resist removal on the basis of discriminatory denial of food aid and medical treatment.
Case type
Names of all parties
RS, EC and BR (Applicants). The Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent).
Name of court
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber), England and Wales - Court of second instance.
Explore more cases
VGH Baden-Württemberg (17.12.2020) A 11 S 2042/20
Germany, 12/17/2020
Conditions in Afghanistan arising from COVID-19-related lockdown measures are sufficiently adverse as to give rise to an Article 3 ECHR-based non-refoulement obligation in the case of a young Afghan man with no social support network facing return to Kabul.
Read more10-142363ASD-BORG/01, Norway- Borgarting Court of Appeal, 23 September 2011
Norway, 11/23/2011
In deportation cases, the state is required to consider a proposed internal relocation alternative that is reasonable, and in so doing it must have regard, amongst other things, to country information revealing serious difficulties associated with the impact of persistent drought on a person’s ability to support himself, in this case through livestock keeping. The case focuses primarily on a procedural law question concerning which provision of domestic law should be followed, but it is important to the extent that it reflects a recognition of the relevance of environmental factors when determining the reasonableness of an internal relocation alternative.
Read moreSecretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) v. K (FC) (Appellant); Fornah (FC) (Appellant) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent), [2006] UKHL 46, United Kingdom- House of Lords (Judicial Committee)
United Kingdom, 10/18/2006
In the decision Lady Hale makes a statement obiter dictum concerning the limited scope of the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees. She states: ‘People fleeing national and international wars, famine or other natural disasters are referred to as refugees, and offered humanitarian aid by the international community, but they do not generally fall within the definition in the 1951 Convention.'
Read moreSufi and Elmi v The United Kingdom (Application nos. 8319/07 and 11449/07) [2011] ECHR 1045 (28 June 2011)
United Kingdom, 6/28/2011
An important decision establishing that the European Court of Human Rights can protect people from refoulement in situations where the conduct of the parties to a conflict can be established as the 'predominate cause' of a humanitarian crisis. In that case, the legal test has regard to an applicant’s ability to cater for his most basic needs, such as food, hygiene and shelter, his vulnerability to ill-treatment and the prospect of his situation improving within a reasonable time-frame.
Read moreHorvath v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2000] UKHL 37, United Kingdom- House of Lords (Judicial Committee),
United Kingdom, 7/6/2000
Lord Hope quotes Dawson J when the latter refers by the way to epidemic, natural disaster and famine in the context of the definition of the refugee in the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees.
Read moreRN (Returnees) Zimbabwe CG [2008] UKAIT 00083
United Kingdom, 11/19/2008
The tribunal recognizes a Zimbabwean teacher as a refugee and also finds removal would violate Article 3 ECHR in the context of political violence including, but not limited to, discriminatory deprivation of humanitarian relief in the context of drought- and flood-related food insecurity.
Read moreRRT Case No. 1203929, [2012] RRTA 819, Australia- Refugee Review Tribunal, 5 October 2012
Australia, 10/5/2012
A Fijian national sought and was denied recognition of refugee status in Australia owing to a fear of being persecuted on the basis of his political opinion. One aspect of his expression of political opinion was criticism of government cyclone response.
Read moreCour administrative d’appel de Bordeaux 2ème chambre, 20BX02193, 20BX02195, December 18, 2020
France, 12/18/2020
This case concerns the decision by the court of appeal of the Bordeaux region to dismiss an appeal by the state challenging an earlier judicial decision to grant a temporary residence permit to a Bangladeshi national with serious respiratory illness, whose condition, it was argued, would be made considerably worse if returned to Bangladesh owing, in part, to the adverse impacts of air pollution in the country. The decision of the Bordeaux court was appealed and reversed by the Supreme Administrative Court of France in December 2021.
Read moreVGH Baden-Württemberg (17.12.2020) A 11 S 2042/20
Germany, 12/17/2020
Conditions in Afghanistan arising from COVID-19-related lockdown measures are sufficiently adverse as to give rise to an Article 3 ECHR-based non-refoulement obligation in the case of a young Afghan man with no social support network facing return to Kabul.
Read more10-142363ASD-BORG/01, Norway- Borgarting Court of Appeal, 23 September 2011
Norway, 11/23/2011
In deportation cases, the state is required to consider a proposed internal relocation alternative that is reasonable, and in so doing it must have regard, amongst other things, to country information revealing serious difficulties associated with the impact of persistent drought on a person’s ability to support himself, in this case through livestock keeping. The case focuses primarily on a procedural law question concerning which provision of domestic law should be followed, but it is important to the extent that it reflects a recognition of the relevance of environmental factors when determining the reasonableness of an internal relocation alternative.
Read moreSecretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) v. K (FC) (Appellant); Fornah (FC) (Appellant) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent), [2006] UKHL 46, United Kingdom- House of Lords (Judicial Committee)
United Kingdom, 10/18/2006
In the decision Lady Hale makes a statement obiter dictum concerning the limited scope of the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees. She states: ‘People fleeing national and international wars, famine or other natural disasters are referred to as refugees, and offered humanitarian aid by the international community, but they do not generally fall within the definition in the 1951 Convention.'
Read moreSufi and Elmi v The United Kingdom (Application nos. 8319/07 and 11449/07) [2011] ECHR 1045 (28 June 2011)
United Kingdom, 6/28/2011
An important decision establishing that the European Court of Human Rights can protect people from refoulement in situations where the conduct of the parties to a conflict can be established as the 'predominate cause' of a humanitarian crisis. In that case, the legal test has regard to an applicant’s ability to cater for his most basic needs, such as food, hygiene and shelter, his vulnerability to ill-treatment and the prospect of his situation improving within a reasonable time-frame.
Read moreHorvath v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2000] UKHL 37, United Kingdom- House of Lords (Judicial Committee),
United Kingdom, 7/6/2000
Lord Hope quotes Dawson J when the latter refers by the way to epidemic, natural disaster and famine in the context of the definition of the refugee in the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees.
Read moreRN (Returnees) Zimbabwe CG [2008] UKAIT 00083
United Kingdom, 11/19/2008
The tribunal recognizes a Zimbabwean teacher as a refugee and also finds removal would violate Article 3 ECHR in the context of political violence including, but not limited to, discriminatory deprivation of humanitarian relief in the context of drought- and flood-related food insecurity.
Read moreRRT Case No. 1203929, [2012] RRTA 819, Australia- Refugee Review Tribunal, 5 October 2012
Australia, 10/5/2012
A Fijian national sought and was denied recognition of refugee status in Australia owing to a fear of being persecuted on the basis of his political opinion. One aspect of his expression of political opinion was criticism of government cyclone response.
Read moreCour administrative d’appel de Bordeaux 2ème chambre, 20BX02193, 20BX02195, December 18, 2020
France, 12/18/2020
This case concerns the decision by the court of appeal of the Bordeaux region to dismiss an appeal by the state challenging an earlier judicial decision to grant a temporary residence permit to a Bangladeshi national with serious respiratory illness, whose condition, it was argued, would be made considerably worse if returned to Bangladesh owing, in part, to the adverse impacts of air pollution in the country. The decision of the Bordeaux court was appealed and reversed by the Supreme Administrative Court of France in December 2021.
Read moreVGH Baden-Württemberg (17.12.2020) A 11 S 2042/20
Germany, 12/17/2020
Conditions in Afghanistan arising from COVID-19-related lockdown measures are sufficiently adverse as to give rise to an Article 3 ECHR-based non-refoulement obligation in the case of a young Afghan man with no social support network facing return to Kabul.
Read more10-142363ASD-BORG/01, Norway- Borgarting Court of Appeal, 23 September 2011
Norway, 11/23/2011
In deportation cases, the state is required to consider a proposed internal relocation alternative that is reasonable, and in so doing it must have regard, amongst other things, to country information revealing serious difficulties associated with the impact of persistent drought on a person’s ability to support himself, in this case through livestock keeping. The case focuses primarily on a procedural law question concerning which provision of domestic law should be followed, but it is important to the extent that it reflects a recognition of the relevance of environmental factors when determining the reasonableness of an internal relocation alternative.
Read more